Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-7292•United States of America v. Adam Joe Louis Jordan, Iii
23-7292Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.02.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7292
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ADAM JOE LOUIS JORDAN, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:11-cr-00011-KDB-DSC-1)
Submitted: February 20, 2025 Decided: February 24, 2025
Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adam Joe Louis Jordan, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adam Joe Louis Jordan, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendments 599 and 821 to the
Sentencing Guidelines. “We review a district court’s decision [whether] to reduce a
sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion and its ruling as to the scope of its legal
authority under § 3582(c)(2) de novo.” United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304
(4th Cir. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Jordan, No. 5:11-cr-00011-KDB-
DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.