Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-1042•Carla Williams v. Michelle Nedelka; Vishwa Patel; Joseph Frenkel
24-1042Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.06.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1042
CARLA WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHELLE NEDELKA; VISHWA PATEL; JOSEPH FRENKEL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, Senior District Judge. (2:23-cv-00370-RAJ-RJK)
Submitted: May 30, 2024 Decided: June 4, 2024
Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carla Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carla Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint without
prejudice for failing to comply with the court’s order to pay the filing fee or file a renewed
motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Williams v. Nedelka, No. 2:23-cv-
00370-RAJ-RJK (E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2023). We also deny Williams’ pending motions. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.