Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-1078•Affinity Recovery Center LLC v. Town Commissioners of Sudlersville
24-1078Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.06.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1078
AFFINITY RECOVERY CENTER LLC,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TOWN COMMISSIONERS OF SUDLERSVILLE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00714-LKG)
Submitted: March 5, 2025 Decided: June 20, 2025
Before RICHARDSON and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: James Peters, KURTZ, PETERS & ASSOCIATES, Boca Raton, Florida, for
Appellant. William C. Dickerson, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Affinity Recovery Center LLC (“Affinity”) appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, on
Affinity’s claims under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-
12134, and the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-19. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Affinity
Recovery Ctr. LLC v. Town Comm’rs of Sudlersville, No. 1:23-cv-00714-LKG (D. Md.
Jan. 12, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.