Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-1376•Hesman Tall, a/k/a Hesman W. Tall, a/k/a Brotha Workitout, a/k/a James Weldon… v. Alphabet Inc.; Google Inc.
24-1376Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.01.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1376
HESMAN TALL, a/k/a Hesman W. Tall, a/k/a Brotha Workitout, a/k/a James
Weldon Hunter, Jr.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALPHABET INC.; GOOGLE INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:23-cv-01393-PX)
Submitted: January 23, 2025 Decided: January 27, 2025
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hesman Tall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hesman Tall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended civil
complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Tall v. Alphabet Inc., No. 8:23-
cv-01393-PX (D. Md., Apr. 17, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.