Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-1502•Michael Anthony Breyan v. Wesfargo Bank
24-1502Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.11.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1502
MICHAEL ANTHONY BREYAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WESFARGO BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00984-BHH)
Submitted: November 19, 2024 Decided: November 21, 2024
Before QUATTLEBAUM, RUSHING, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Breyan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Anthony Breyan appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation to dismiss, upon 28 U.S.C. § 1915 review, Breyan’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action. Limiting our review to the issues raised in Breyan’s informal brief, see 4th
Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014), and to the magistrate
judge’s rulings to which Breyan specifically objected, see Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239,
245-46 (4th Cir. 2017), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Breyan v. Wesfargo Bank, No. 3:24-cv-00984-BHH (D.S.C. May 15, 2024).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.