My’ka El v. R. Preston, Jr.; M. Wilde; Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department

24-1807Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit06.08.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1807
MY’KA EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. PRESTON, JR.; M. WILDE; CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00090-KDB-SCR)
Submitted: July 8, 2025 Decided: August 6, 2025
Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
My’Ka El, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Wade Sturgill, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
My’Ka El appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss
his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny El’s motion for production
of transcripts at government expense and affirm the district court’s order. El v. Preston,
No. 3:19-cv-00090-KDB-SCR (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2024). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.