Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-1845•Veronica W. Ogunsula v. Tfc Michael Warrenfeltz
24-1845Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.03.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1845
VERONICA W. OGUNSULA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TFC MICHAEL WARRENFELTZ,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen Lipton Hollander, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-02568-ELH)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 6, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Veronica W. Ogunsula, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Hott, Assistant Attorney
General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Veronica W. Ogunsula appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s
motion for summary judgment on Ogunsula’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have
reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ogunsula’s
motions to reverse on appeal and to amend her informal brief and affirm the district court’s
order. Ogunsula v. Warrenfeltz, No. 1:20-cv-02568-ELH (D. Md. July 30, 2024). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.