Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-1952•Zheni Naumova, a/k/a Zheni D. Naumova v. Sharonview Federal Credit Union
24-1952Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.03.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1952
ZHENI NAUMOVA, a/k/a Zheni D. Naumova,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHARONVIEW FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (9:22-cv-04632-BHH)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 3, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zheni Naumova, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Ashley Ahrens, JACKSON LEWIS PC,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Zheni Naumova appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation to grant Defendant summary judgment on Naumova’s claims brought
pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Naumova v. Sharonview Fed. Credit Union, No. 9:22-cv-04632-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 26,
2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.