Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-2023•Victor Jackson v. New Kent Circuit Court
24-2023Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.03.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2023
VICTOR JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NEW KENT CIRCUIT COURT; NEW KENT JDR COURT; NEW KENT
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (Victim
Witness Program),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00330-MHL)
Submitted: March 27, 2025 Decided: March 31, 2025
Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Victor Jackson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint
without prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to comply with a court order. We
have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal
of Jackson’s amended complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for his failure to comply
with the court’s order regarding the proper form of his amended complaint. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Jackson v. New Kent Cir. Ct., No. 3:24-cv-00330-
MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 13, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.