Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-2136•Harris L. Winns v. LOUIS DEJOY, U.S. Postal Service
24-2136Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.03.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2136
HARRIS L. WINNS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LOUIS DEJOY, U.S. Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00241-DJN)
Submitted: January 22, 2025 Decided: March 25, 2025
Before RICHARDSON, RUSHING, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harris L. Winns, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney,
Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Harris L. Winns appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint
alleging various claims based on employment discrimination on grounds of res judicata.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Winns’
motion to appoint counsel, and we affirm the district court’s order. Winns v. DeJoy, No.
3:24-cv-00241-DJN (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.