Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-2233•Karen Y. Baez v. Synectics for Managment Decisions, Inc.
24-2233Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.04.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2233
KAREN Y. BAEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SYNECTICS FOR MANAGMENT DECISIONS, INC.; BECKER VISSEPP PSC,
c/o Jane Becker Whitaker, Lawyer; LAW OFFICES OF MATHEW
MUGGERIDGE, c/o Hector I. Hernandez, Lawyer; RICHARD E. HAGERTY;
NIXON PEABODY, c/o Myra A. Benjamin,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:24-cv-01350-PTG-WEF)
Submitted: April 24, 2025 Decided: April 28, 2025
Before RICHARDSON and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karen Y. Baez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Karen Y. Baez appeals the district court’s order reviewing her civil complaint
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, denying her motions for leave to proceed in the district court
without prepayment of fees or costs, and denying all other pending motions as moot. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Baez v. Synectics for Mgmt. Decisions, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-01350-PTG-WEF
(E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.