Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-6073•PAUL R. BEST, JR., a/k/a Paul Rawling Best, Jr. v. Sgt. Sommers
24-6073Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.06.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6073
PAUL R. BEST, JR., a/k/a Paul Rawling Best, Jr.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SGT. SOMMERS; CO MITCHELL; CO SHOLER; CO CUMMINGHAM; CO
CALLOWAY; DEPUTY RAWLS; MAJOR LEGGINGS; CO HARRIS; CO
GRADY; DOCTOR ON DUTY; CO WANNAMAKER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (1:23-cv-05539-MGL)
Submitted: June 13, 2024 Decided: June 18, 2024
Before RUSHING and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul R. Best, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Paul R. Best, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing Best’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.∗
Best v. Sommers, No. 1:23-cv-05539-MGL (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ The district court’s judgment dismissed the complaint without prejudice.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.