Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-6181•United States of America v. Michael Harriot, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a…
24-6181Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.06.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6181
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett,
a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00341-MGL-3)
Submitted: June 13, 2024 Decided: June 18, 2024
Before RUSHING and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Owen Harriot, Appellant Pro Se. Elliott Bishop Daniels, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Harriot appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Harriot, No. 3:99-cr-
00341-MGL-3 (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.