Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-6232•United States of America v. Quentin Dwayne Mcnebb, a/k/a QB
24-6232Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.09.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6232
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
QUENTIN DWAYNE MCNEBB, a/k/a QB,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Danville. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (4:12-cr-00001-JPJ-4)
Submitted: September 25, 2025 Decided: September 29, 2025
Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Quentin Dwayne McNebb, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Barish Swartz, Special Assistant
United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Quentin Dwayne McNebb appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 821 to the
Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and finding no reversible error. See
United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013) (providing standard).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. McNebb, No. 4:12-cr-
00001-JPJ-4 (W.D. Va. Feb. 20, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.