Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-6389•Jibri Cunningham v. Warden H. Quay
24-6389Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.08.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6389
JIBRI CUNNINGHAM,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN H. QUAY,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Elizabeth W. Hanes, District Judge. (2:22-cv-00358-EWH-LRL)
Submitted: August 22, 2024 Decided: August 27, 2024
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jibri Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jibri Cunningham, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cunningham’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 petition in which Cunningham challenged the execution of his sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. Cunningham v. Quay, No. 2:22-cv-00358-EWH-LRL (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 2024).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.