Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-6647•Rodney Elroy Cobbs v. Richard K. Harrell; Ricardo Jensen
24-6647Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.06.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6647
RODNEY ELROY COBBS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD K. HARRELL; RICARDO JENSEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:24-ct-03106-BO-RJ)
Submitted: June 13, 2025 Decided: June 23, 2025
Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Elroy Cobbs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Elroy Cobbs appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Cobbs v.
Harrell, No. 5:24-ct-03106-BO-RJ (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.