Olee Wonzo Robinson v. Warden Dave Lou

24-6993Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6993
OLEE WONZO ROBINSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN DAVE LOU,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-hc-02200-BO)
Submitted: April 20, 2026 Decided: April 27, 2026
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Olee Wonzo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Olee Wonzo Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting his motion
for reconsideration in part, vacating the court’s dismissal order, and reopening Robinson’s
case. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Robinson
seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we deny Robinson’s motion to appoint counsel and suspend proceedings and
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.