Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
24-7159•Ken Ejimofor Ezeah v. Warden Heckard
24-7159Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.05.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7159
KEN EJIMOFOR EZEAH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN HECKARD,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:23-hc-02246-M)
Submitted: May 22, 2025 Decided: May 28, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ken Ejimofor Ezeah, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ken Ejimofor Ezeah, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and a subsequent order denying his motion for
reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Ezeah v. Heckard, No.
5:23-hc-02246-M (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2024 & Nov. 21, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.