Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-1174•Russell Arnold v. United Parcel Service Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
25-1174Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.09.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1174
RUSSELL ARNOLD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:24-cv-00340-JAG)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 2, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Russell Arnold, Appellant Pro Se. Michael James Ritter, Shannon Brown Schmoyer,
SCHMOYER REINHARD LLP, San Antonio, Texas, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Russell Arnold appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pro se employment
discrimination complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Arnold v. United
Parcel Serv. Supply Chain Sol., No. 3:24-cv-00340-JAG (E.D. Va., Jan. 23, 2025). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.