STEAMSHIP TRADE ASSOCIATION OF BALTIMORE, INCORPORATED, International Longshoremen’s… v. Riker J. McKenzie-El, Jr.

25-1331Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.07.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1331
STEAMSHIP TRADE ASSOCIATION OF BALTIMORE, INCORPORATED,
International Longshoremen’s Association (AFL-CIO) Container Royalty Fund
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
v.
RIKER J. MCKENZIE-EL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Adam B. Abelson, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00794-ABA)
Submitted: July 29, 2025 Decided: July 31, 2025
Before KING, WYNN, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Riker J. McKenzie-El, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Campbell Rennie, Sharra Tinyi
Wong, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee

-- 1 of 3 --

2
United States. Corey Smith Bott, ABATO, RUBENSTEIN & ABATO, PA, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee Steamship Trade Association of Baltimore, Incorporated.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Riker J. McKenzie-El, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing Container
Royalty Fund’s complaint seeking an order directing the Fund regarding the disposition of
funds purportedly subject to a levy from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). During the
course of the proceedings, the IRS confirmed that the debt that was the subject of the levy
had been satisfied and disclaimed any interest in the funds. Container Royalty thus released
the funds to McKenzie-El and the district court dismissed the complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. Steamship Trade Assoc. of Baltimore, Inc. v. McKenzie-El, No.
1:23-cv-00794-ABA (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.