Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-1537•S. BOYD, Successor v. Municipality Robersonville
25-1537Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.12.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1537
S. BOYD, Successor,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MUNICIPALITY ROBERSONVILLE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:24-cv-00059-FL)
Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 1, 2025
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
S. Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Frederick Hughes Bailey, III, SUMRELL SUGG, PA, New
Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
S. Boyd appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint and denying reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the
record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
Boyd v. Mun. Robersonville, No. 4:24-cv-00059-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2024; Apr. 16,
2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.