Monica Gail Goff v. GAIL B. GOFF, USPS City Mail Carrier

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1611
MONICA GAIL GOFF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GAIL B. GOFF, USPS City Mail Carrier,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:25-cv-00024-NKM)
Submitted: October 16, 2025 Decided: October 20, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monica Gail Goff, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Monica Gail Goff appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to transfer
venue and dismissing, after a review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), her civil complaint
for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) (providing that venue is proper
in any “judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of
the State in which the district is located; [or] a judicial district in which a substantial part
of the events . . . giving rise to the claim occurred”); Francis v. Giacomelli, 588 F.3d 186,
193 (4th Cir. 2009) (“[N]aked assertions of wrongdoing necessitate some factual
enhancement within the complaint to cross the line between possibility and plausibility of
entitlement to relief.” (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Goff v. Goff, No. 6:25-cv-00024-NKM (W.D. Va. May 1, 2025). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --