Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-1818•Najia Rahmani v. Carla De La Pava
25-1818Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.11.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1818
NAJIA RAHMANI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CARLA DE LA PAVA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:25-cv-01026-RDA-LRV)
Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025
Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Najia Rahmani, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Najia Rahmani appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her
civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for improper claim splitting and for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Rahmani’s motion for default judgment and affirm the district
court’s order. Rahmani v. De La Pava, No. 1:25-cv-01026-RDA-LRV (E.D. Va. July 10,
2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.