Yahdina Overstreet-U-Deen, a/k/a Phyllis Yahdina Overstreet-U-Deen v. S.c. Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1840
YAHDINA OVERSTREET-U-DEEN, a/k/a Phyllis Yahdina Overstreet-U-Deen,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
S.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; S.C.D.C. GENERAL
COUNSEL, With all of its members; BRYAN STIRLING, S.C.D.C. Director;
S.C.D.C. DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL; WARDEN JAMES; A.W. SMITH; A.W.
MCDUFFY; MAJOR MEEKS; SGT. CROWLEY; NURSE MILLER; WARDEN
STONEBREAKER; UNITED STATES CONGRESS, And all members contained
therein; CATHOLIC ARCH DIOCESE AND POPE; MR. LAWRENZ, Director of
the Well Path Center; WELL PATH CENTER; 194 MEMBER STATES OF THE
UNITED NATIONS; COUNTY OF RICHLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA; COUNTY
OF KERSHAW; COUNTY OF HORRY; ADAIR FORD BUROUGHS, Federal
Attorney for the State of South Carolina, U.S. Attorney; UNITED STATES
SENATE, And all members contained therein,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (9:25-cv-01527-BHH-MHC)
Submitted: May 28, 2026 Decided: June 1, 2026
Before WYNN, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Yahdina Overstreet-U-Deen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Yahdina Overstreet-U-Deen seeks to appeal the district court’s orders (1) separating
her complaint from three co-plaintiffs and (2) denying her motions for appointment of
counsel, recusal of the district court judge, recusal of the magistrate judge, appointment of
a new magistrate judge, an extension of time, permission to intervene, consolidation of
cases, complex case designation, and various other forms of relief.* This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292, Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Overstreet-U-Deen seeks to appeal are
neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Overstreet-U-Deen has also filed motions in this court to remand; to consolidate
this appeal with docket numbers 25-6598, 25-6599, 25-6602; to vacate; for acceptance; for
judicial notice; for a preliminary injunction; for a temporary restraining order; for
sanctions; for a declaratory judgment; to submit additional evidence; and to supplement
her motions. We grant Overstreet-U-Deen’s motion to accept her corrected, signed notice
of appeal and deny all remaining motions.

-- 3 of 3 --