Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-2015•Dora L. Adkins v. Best Buy Co., Inc.
25-2015Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.12.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2015
DORA L. ADKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BEST BUY CO., INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:25-cv-01354-LMB-LRV)
Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 2, 2025
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dora L. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dora L. Adkins appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to
file a proposed emergency complaint and denying as moot her motion to expedite.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Adkins v. Best Buy Co., No. 1:25-cv-01354-LMB-LRV (E.D. Va.
Aug. 19, 2025). Additionally, based on the numerous meritless appeals Adkins has pursued
in this court, we warn her that filing further meritless or frivolous appeals could result in
an order directing her to show cause why this court should not impose a prefiling injunction
or other sanctions.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.