Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-2240•Pakuja Crystal Vang v. Valdese Weaver; USA Government; Solicitor General of the United States
25-2240Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.04.2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2240
PAKUJA CRYSTAL VANG
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VALDESE WEAVER; USA GOVERNMENT; SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE
UNITED STATES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:25-cv-00330-MR-WCM)
Submitted: March 17, 2026 Decided: April 23, 2026
Before WYNN, HARRIS, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pakuja Crystal Vang, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Pakuja Crystal Vang appeals the district court’s order dismissing her pro se civil
action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. See
Nagy v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 252, 254-55 (4th Cir. 2004) (explaining standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Vang v. Valdese Weaver, No.
1:25-cv-00330-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2025). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.