Shaunesi Yvette Deberry v. Matthew John Fader, in his official

25-2374Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2374
SHAUNESI YVETTE DEBERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MATTHEW JOHN FADER, in his official and individual capacities as Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court of Maryland; GREGORY WELLS, in his official and
individual capacities as Chief Judge of the Appellate Court of Maryland;
DOUGLAS R.M. NAZARIAN, in his official and individual capacities as Judge of
the Appellate Court of Maryland; ANNE COLT LEITESS, in her official and
individual capacities as State’s Attorney for Anne Arundel County; SHIRLEY
MARIE WATTS, in her official and individual capacities as Associate Justice of
the Supreme Court of Maryland; RACHEL DOMBROWSKI, in her official and
individual capacities as Clerk of the Appellate Court of Maryland; GREGORY
HILTON, in his official and individual capacities as Clerk of the Supreme Court of
Maryland,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, Chief District Judge. (1:25-cv-03586-GLR)
Submitted: January 22, 2026 Decided: January 26, 2026
Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Shaunesi Yvette DeBerry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Shaunesi Yvette DeBerry appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order and deny DeBerry’s motion for PACER fee exemption and electronic access
accommodation. DeBerry v. Fader, No. 1:25-cv-03586-GLR (D. Md., Nov. 7, 2025). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.