Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-2500•Darrion Clay v. Schneider Electric Inc.
25-2500Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.06.2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2500
DARRION CLAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (8:24-cv-07140-DCC)
Submitted: June 18, 2026 Decided: June 23, 2026
Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrion Clay, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darrion Clay appeals the district court’s order denying Clay’s motion for
reconsideration of the court’s prior order denying Clay’s postjudgment motion for leave to
file a second amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Clay v. Schneider Elec. Inc., No.
8:24-cv-07140-DCC (D.S.C. Oct. 16, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.