Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-6094•Clifton Donell Lyles v. Chief Justice Donald W. Beatty; F. Craig Wilkerson, Jr.
25-6094Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.05.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6094
CLIFTON DONELL LYLES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. BEATTY; F. CRAIG WILKERSON, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Jacquelyn Denise Austin, District Judge. (4:24-cv-03911-JDA)
Submitted: May 22, 2025 Decided: May 28, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clifton Donell Lyles, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clifton Donell Lyles appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge as modified and dismissing with prejudice Lyles’s
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Lyles
v. Beatty, No. 4:24-cv-03911-JDA (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 2025). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.