Jessiah James Hubbard v. JEFFREY NEALE JACKSON, North Carolina Department of Justice

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6118
JESSIAH JAMES HUBBARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY NEALE JACKSON, North Carolina Department of Justice; JAYLA
COLE, North Carolina Department of Justice; SUPREME COURT OF NORTH
CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS; PAUL C.
RIDGEWAY, Superior Court Division; CLAIRE V. HILL, Superior Court Division;
NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Tort Claims Court,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:24-ct-03272-BO-RJ)
Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 29, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessiah James Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jessiah James Hubbard appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii),∗ and the denial of nondispositive motions as moot. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s determination that absolute
immunity, Eleventh Amendment immunity, and prosecutorial immunity barred Hubbard’s
claims, or in the court’s denial of Johnson’s remaining motions as moot. Because we affirm
on immunity grounds, we need not reach the court’s alternative reasoning. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ The district court’s order is final and appealable because the court did not grant
leave to amend. Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order).

-- 2 of 2 --