Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-6213•United States of America v. Alexander Edward Bell
25-6213Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.11.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6213
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALEXANDER EDWARD BELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cr-00008-HEH-1)
Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025
Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Edward Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel J. Honold, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Edward Bell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 821 to the Sentencing
Guidelines. Having reviewed the record, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district
court’s determination that the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors weighed against a sentence
reduction. See United States v. Martin, 916 F.3d 389, 395 (4th Cir. 2019) (explaining
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v.
Bell, No. 3:14-cr-00008-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2025). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.