Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-6352•Justin Hawkins, a/k/a Justin Antonio Hawkins v. Sheriff Robert Fountain
25-6352Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.11.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6352
JUSTIN HAWKINS, a/k/a Justin Antonio Hawkins,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHERIFF ROBERT FOUNTAIN; CHIEF FRED ROBERTSON; WOODROW
DAVID YANCEY; J. YANCEY-WASHINGTON; GRANVILLE COUNTY
COURTHOUSE; JOHN DOE SURETY COMPANY; GRANVILLE COUNTY;
GRANVILLE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:24-ct-03076-M-RJ)
Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025
Before RUSING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Justin Antonio Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Justin Hawkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and discern no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm
the district court’s order. Hawkins v. Fountain, No. 5:24-ct-03076-M-RJ (E.D.N.C. Apr.
16, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.