Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-6416•Abir Ali v. ESKER LEE TATUM, Warden; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE
25-6416Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.12.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6416
ABIR ALI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ESKER LEE TATUM, Warden; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00073-DJN-MRC)
Submitted: December 23, 2025 Decided: December 31, 2025
Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Abir Ali, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Abir Ali appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his second particularized
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915A. We have reviewed
the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Ali’s motion to seal his
informal brief and affirm the district court’s order. Ali v. Tatum, No. 3:24-cv-00073-DJN-
MRC (E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.