Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-6465•United States of America v. George Harris
25-6465Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.10.2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6465
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GEORGE HARRIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:88-cr-00076-AWA-1)
Submitted: October 16, 2025 Decided: October 21, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record
and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) factors weighed against granting relief. See United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th
167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Harris, No. 2:88-
cr-00076-AWA-1 (E.D. Va. May 6, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.