Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-6863•Marcel Romains Wallace v. Renetta Butts; Wanda Bazemore
25-6863Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.06.2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6863
MARCEL ROMAINS WALLACE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RENETTA BUTTS; WANDA BAZEMORE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:23-ct-03005-M-RJ)
Submitted: June 18, 2026 Decided: June 23, 2026
Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcel Romains Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Jansen Banfield, HARRIS,
CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marcel Romains Wallace appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Wallace has also moved for oral argument. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wallace’s motion
and affirm the district court’s order. Wallace v. Butts, No. 5:23-CT-3005-M-RJ (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 10, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.