Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
25-6915•Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr. v. Guard Richardson
25-6915Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.06.2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6915
WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GUARD RICHARDSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 25-7033
WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GUARD RICHARDSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:25-cv-09353-DCC)
Submitted: May 28, 2026 Decided: June 2, 2026
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before WYNN, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., appeals the district
court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and denying a
postjudgment motion. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Holtzclaw’s pending appellate motions, and we affirm the district
court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.