Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr. v. MICHAEL FLOYD PITTMAN, Estate of Michael Floyd Pittman

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6949
WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL FLOYD PITTMAN, Estate of Michael Floyd Pittman; CAROLINA
BATH & KITCHEN INC., d/b/a Dreammaker Bath & Kitchen; LYNN PITTMAN,
Widow; LEE PRICKETT, Atty; LAW FIRM OF LEE PRICKETT; MELODIE
LANE; RANDY HORNSBY; MARK CAIN; DOUG DWYER; ADVISORY
TEAM OF DOUG DWYER; DREAMMAKER BATH AND KITCHEN
CORPORATE; WORLDWIDE REFINISHING; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA;
S.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL; S. C. SECRETARY OF STATE; S.C. OFFICE OF
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL; ATTORNEY PACE, of Bryan, Colette, Faris and
Pace; LAW FIRM OF BRYAN, COLETTE, FARIS AND PACE; MARJORIE
MORGAN; MELLISA SPIVEY, Spivey Law Group; RANDY SKINNER, Skinner
Law Firm; JUDGE HELEN E. BURRIS, SC Bankruptcy Supreme Court Justice;
JUDGE TIMOTHY MADDEN, Greenville County Family Court; LAW FIRM FOR
DREAMMAKER CORPORATE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:25-cv-00025-DCC)
Submitted: April 23, 2026 Decided: April 28, 2026
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his
postjudgment motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error
in the court’s conclusion that Holtzclaw presented no grounds for relief.* Accordingly, we
deny Holtzclaw’s pending appellate motions, and we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We previously affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the complaint. See
Holtzclaw v. Pittman, No. 25-1364, 2025 WL 2694384, at *1 (4th Cir. Sep. 22, 2025).

-- 3 of 3 --