Phillip Edward Hill v. Frederick County Maryland District Court

25-6964Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.03.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6964
PHILLIP EDWARD HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FREDERICK COUNTY MARYLAND DISTRICT COURT; DINO FLORES,
District Court Judge; BRETT ANGLER, States Attorney; ALAN WINIK,
Plaintiff’s Ex Counsel; FREDERICK COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:24-cv-01897-LKG)
Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 3, 2026
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip E. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Phillip E. Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pro se amended civil
complaint. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Hill v. Frederick Cnty. Md. Dist. Ct., No. 1:24-cv-01897-
LKG (D. Md. filed Oct. 24, 2025 & entered Oct. 27, 2025). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.