Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr. v. Judge Stokes; Judge Stone; Wendy Moses; Marjorie Morgan; Jerri

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-7000
WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE STOKES; JUDGE STONE; WENDY MOSES; MARJORIE MORGAN;
JERRI,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 25-7021
WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE STOKES; JUDGE STONE; WENDY MOSES; MARJORIE MORGAN;
JERRI,
Defendants - Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
No. 25-7022
WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE STOKES; JUDGE STONE; WENDY MOSES; MARJORIE MORGAN;
JERRI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:25-cv-07499-DCC)
Submitted: April 23, 2026 Decided: April 28, 2026
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., appeals the district
court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to prosecute and
denying several postjudgment motions to amend. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holtzclaw’s informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir.
2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny Holtzclaw’s
pending appellate motions, and we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --