United States v. Warner

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 21, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-10685
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TAMMIE JEANNE WARNER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:97-CR-00094-ALL-H
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Tammie Jeanne Warner appeals the district court’s revocation
of her supervised release. Warner, who is represented on appeal
by the Assistant Federal Public Defender, has filed a pro se
motion to supplement counsel’s appellate brief. Warner’s pro se
motion is DENIED. See United States v. Ogbonna, 184 F.3d 447,
449 & n.1 (5th Cir. 1999); see also 5TH CIR. R. 28.7.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 03-10685
-2-
** 71 F.3d 507 (5th Cir. 1995), opinion clarified, 77 F.3d
811 (5th Cir. 1996).
Warner argues that the district court failed to comply with
the requirements set forth in United States v. Grandlund** in
admitting the reports of the positive laboratory tests into
evidence during the revocation proceeding. Warner has not
demonstrated that the district court departed from the procedures
outlined in Grandlund. See Grandlund, 71 F.3d at 511-12.
The district court’s judgment revoking Warner’s supervised
release is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT COUNSEL’S BRIEF BY APPELLANT
PRO SE DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --