Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-11019•Pierce v. United Rentals Inc, et al
03-11019Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit03.11.2004
*District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana,
sitting by designation.
**Pursuant to 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIRCUIT
RULE 47.5.4.
1
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
November 3, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
______________________
No. 03-11019
______________________
MICHAEL JON PIERCE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
vs.
UNITED RENTALS, INC., UNITED RENTALS
OCCUPATIONAL INJURY BENEFIT PLAN and
EMPLOYERS HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:01-CV-0995-K
______________________
Before WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE,* District
Judge.
PER CURIAM:**
The court has considered the parties’ positions in light of
oral argument, the briefs, and pertinent portions of the record.
Having done so, the court finds no reversible error of fact or
-- 1 of 2 --
2
law and AFFIRMS for essentially the reasons stated by the
district court. See Pierce v. United Rentals, Inc., No. 3:01-CV-
0995-K, 2003 WL 22289882 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2003).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.