United States v. Reveles-Rosales

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-11212
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SALVADOR REVELES-ROSALES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:05-CR-41-ALL
--------------------
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Salvador Reveles-Rosales
(Reveles) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Reveles was notified of his right to file a response, but he
failed to do so. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --