United States v. Sealed Appellant

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 14, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-40921
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SEALED APPELLANT,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:04-CR-404-1
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel on direct appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the
record, and the appellant’s response discloses no nonfrivolous
issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2. The motion for leave to supplement pleadings with
a memorandum of law is DENIED as unnecessary as we have
considered the appellant’s response to counsel’s Anders motion.

-- 1 of 1 --