Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-60787•Nassiran v. Gonzales
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
September 15, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-60787
Summary Calendar
MORTAZA NASSIRAN,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A74 085 447
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mortaza Nassiran, a native and citizen of Iran, appeals
the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision affirming the
Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of
removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b. Because cancellation of removal is
governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1229b, the jurisdictional bar of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(I) applies in the instant case. This court lacks
jurisdiction to review the Attorney General’s discretionary
decision regarding cancellation of removal. See Wilmore v.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Gonzales, 2006 WL 1828644, __ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. July 5, 2006);
Rueda v. Ashcroft, 380 F.3d 831, 831 (5th Cir. 2004); 8 U.S.C.
§ 1229b(b); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(I). The petition for review
is DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.