Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-11371•Norwood v. USA
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
July 24, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-11371
Summary Calendar
STEPHEN WAYNE NORWOOD,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:06-CV-119
--------------------
Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Stephen Wayne Norwood, Texas prisoner # 601001, appeals from
the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition
as duplicative of a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application. Norwood
challenges his transfer from federal prison to state prison,
contending that the state parole revocation procedure is
defective.
Norwood contended in both actions that he should not be
transferred back to the Texas prison system because of
deficiencies in his parole revocation proceedings there.
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 06-11371
-2-
Norwood’s § 2241 petition relied on the same series of events and
operative facts as his § 2254 application. The district court
did not err by dismissing the § 2241 petition as duplicative.
See Pittman v. Moore, 980 F.2d 994, 994-95 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.