Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-51333•United States v. Vendetti
06-51333Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit28.06.2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 28, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-51333
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DARRELL P. VENDETTI,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:06-CR-92-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Darrell P. Vendetti pleaded guilty to count 1 of an
indictment charging him with possession of child pornography and
was sentenced under the advisory guidelines to a 120-month term
of imprisonment and to a three-year period of supervised release.
He was ordered to pay a $1,000 fine. Vendetti gave timely notice
of his appeal.
Vendetti contends that the district court should have
reduced his offense level because he accepted responsibility for
his criminal conduct, notwithstanding the district court’s
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 06-51333
-2-
finding that the offense level should be increased because
Vendetti obstructed justice by destroying evidence. Vendetti has
not shown that the district court’s determination, that his case
does not present extraordinary circumstances making such an
adjustment appropriate, was without foundation. See U.S.S.G.
§ 3E1.1, comment. (n.4); United States v. Washington, 340 F.3d
222, 227 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Chung, 261 F.3d 536,
540 (5th Cir. 2001). The judgment is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.