Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-60656•United Invstr Life v. Nationwide Life Ins, et al
06-60656Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit30.05.2007
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 30, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
for the Fifth Circuit
No. 06-60656
UNITED INVESTORS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF AMERICA; NATIONWIDE LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY;
NATIONWIDE LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY OF AMERICA; NATIONWIDE
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; and NATIONWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
(2:04-CV-12)
Before GARWOOD, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-Appellant United Investors Life Insurance Company
(UILIC) appeals an order of the district court granting summary
judgment to Defendants-Appellees Nationwide Life Insurance Company
and its affiliates (collectively, “Nationwide”). The district court
granted summary judgment after determining that (1) the portion of
-- 1 of 2 --
UILIC’s claims that sounded in derivative liability were barred by
res judicata; (2) the portion of UILIC’s claims that sounded in
direct liability failed to state claims upon which relief could be
granted; and (3) in the alternative, the continuing tort doctrine
did not apply to save UILIC’s claims from the statute of
limitations time bar. Having carefully reviewed the parties’
briefs, the record, and the oral argument in this case, we AFFIRM
essentially for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.