Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-60876•Summary Calendar ADEL I ADAWOUD v. Peter Dkeisler, Acting U Sattorney General
06-60876Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit02.10.2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-60876
Summary Calendar
ADEL I A DAWOUD
Petitioner
v.
PETER D KEISLER, ACTING U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Respondent.
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A79 464 889
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Adel I A Dawoud was born in Libya but moved to the West Bank of the
Jordan when he was a child. He has petitioned this court for review of the Board
of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order affirming the denial of asylum, withholding
of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Dawoud’s
due process claim about the process he received relative to his application for
asylum fails because he does not have a constitutionally protected liberty
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 2, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 06-60876
2
interest in asylum. See Ahmed v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 433, 440 (5th Cir. 2006);
Majd v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 590, 595 (5th Cir. 2006); 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(A).
Dawoud fails to show that the record compels reversal of the finding of the IJ
that he is not entitled to asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the
CAT. See; Lopez-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 263 F.3d 442, 444 (5th Cir. 2001); Mikhael
v. INS, 115 F.3d 299, 306 (5th Cir. 1997). Furthermore, the BIA did not abuse
its discretion when it refused to reopen the proceedings. See Lara v. Trominski,
216 F.3d 487, 496 (5th Cir. 2000). Review of the BIA's denial of asylum,
withholding of removal, and relief under the CAT is DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.