Summary Calendar RAMBHAI MANIKLAL-PATEL v. PETER D. KEISLER, Acting U SATTORNEY GENERAL

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
September 26, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-61040
Summary Calendar
RAMBHAI MANIKLAL-PATEL
Petitioner
v.
PETER D. KEISLER, Acting U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Respondent
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A73 088 140
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rambhai Maniklal-Patel, a native and citizen of India, petitions this court
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his
untimely motion to reopen removal proceedings. Maniklal-Patel has abandoned
any challenges to the BIA’s dismissal of his appeal from the motion to reopen he
filed with the immigration judge by failing to brief any issues relevant to that
motion. See Al Ra’id v. Ingle, 69 F.3d 28, 33 (5th Cir. 1995). Maniklal-Patel
argues that his BIA motion to reopen met the requirements set forth in 8 C.F.R.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 06-61040
2
§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). Maniklal-Patel has failed to show that the BIA abused its
discretion by denying his motion to reopen. See Lara v. Trominski, 216 F.3d 487,
496 (5th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, his petition for review is DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --