Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-10765•Weinberg v. Natl Ftbl League, et al
07-10765Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit07.08.2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-10765
STEVE WEINBERG;
Plaintiff-Appellant;
v.
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, RICHARD
BERTHLESON, GENE UPSHAW, TOM DEPASO, TRACE ARMSTRONG,
ROGER KAPLAN, JOHN COLLINS, KEITH WASHINGTON, TONY
AGNONE, HOWARD SHATSKY, and MARK LEVIN;
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:06-CV-2332
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-Appellant Steve Weinberg argues that the district court erred
when it granted the motion to compel arbitration and to dismiss the petition
filed by Defendants-Appellees National Football League Players Association
(“NFLPA”), Richard Berthleson, Gene Upshaw, Tom DePaso, Trace Armstrong,
John Collins, Keith Washington, Tony Agnone, Howard Shatsky, and Mark
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 7, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 07-10765
2
Levin. Having reviewed the briefs, heard oral argument, and considered the
record, we agree with the district court that all of Weinberg’s claims against the
aforementioned Defendants-Appellees fall within the scope of the arbitration
clause in Section 5 of the NFLPA Regulations. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the
grant of the motion. However, we VACATE the district court’s order regarding
Defendant-Appellee Roger Kaplan, and we INSTRUCT the district court to
consider Kaplan’s motion to dismiss on remand.
AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, REMANDED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.